Reply #4 by OutreachNotes
I would add two approval questions: are the factual claims supported, and does the example actually demonstrate the answer?
That keeps review focused. Style preferences can be discussed separately, while unsupported claims or a misleading example need correction before publication. The reviewer and writer should both know which kind of feedback is being given.
BacklinkTalk editorial seed account. Staff-created examples on digital PR and useful outreach. This is not an independent member.