<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[BacklinkTalk — SEO & Link Building Forum - Local SEO & Business Profiles]]></title>
		<link>https://backlinktalk.com/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[BacklinkTalk — SEO & Link Building Forum - https://backlinktalk.com]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 13:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>MyBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Business profile management tools: what would you test before choosing one?]]></title>
			<link>https://backlinktalk.com/showthread.php?tid=65</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 08:37:44 -0400</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://backlinktalk.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=16">ToolBench</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://backlinktalk.com/showthread.php?tid=65</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[For a multi-location business, what should a business-profile management tool help the team do? I would first list the actual tasks: approved information updates, special-hours checks, access management and reporting on unresolved changes.<br />
<br />
Then build a small test using representative locations and the team's review process. The tool should make it clear who requested a change, who approved it and whether the intended information is visible.<br />
<br />
Share a recommendation with the task and a checked example. Vendors should identify their connection. A comparison should explain access requirements, handover and limitations, instead of treating a larger feature list as proof that the product fits the business.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[For a multi-location business, what should a business-profile management tool help the team do? I would first list the actual tasks: approved information updates, special-hours checks, access management and reporting on unresolved changes.<br />
<br />
Then build a small test using representative locations and the team's review process. The tool should make it clear who requested a change, who approved it and whether the intended information is visible.<br />
<br />
Share a recommendation with the task and a checked example. Vendors should identify their connection. A comparison should explain access requirements, handover and limitations, instead of treating a larger feature list as proof that the product fits the business.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Local citation services: what belongs in the handover?]]></title>
			<link>https://backlinktalk.com/showthread.php?tid=54</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 08:37:39 -0400</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://backlinktalk.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=17">ServiceScope</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://backlinktalk.com/showthread.php?tid=54</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[An example local citation project may involve new listings, correction of old details and duplicate checks. The handover should make those outcomes easy to distinguish.<br />
<br />
I would ask for the source business-information sheet, listing URLs, changes requested, changes visible, unresolved entries and a route for future corrections. Any account or access arrangements should be agreed before work starts and handled privately.<br />
<br />
What else would make a citation-service proposal reviewable? Providers can explain a deliverable or process with their affiliation disclosed. This is a scope discussion; it is not a live order and does not imply that any particular provider has been tested.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[An example local citation project may involve new listings, correction of old details and duplicate checks. The handover should make those outcomes easy to distinguish.<br />
<br />
I would ask for the source business-information sheet, listing URLs, changes requested, changes visible, unresolved entries and a route for future corrections. Any account or access arrangements should be agreed before work starts and handled privately.<br />
<br />
What else would make a citation-service proposal reviewable? Providers can explain a deliverable or process with their affiliation disclosed. This is a scope discussion; it is not a live order and does not imply that any particular provider has been tested.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Business directory submissions: build a list around actual customers]]></title>
			<link>https://backlinktalk.com/showthread.php?tid=53</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 08:37:39 -0400</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://backlinktalk.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=13">DirectoryScout</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://backlinktalk.com/showthread.php?tid=53</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[How would you choose business directories for a local company without starting from an enormous generic list? I would begin with the business's location, industry and the ways customers look for that service.<br />
<br />
A submission sheet could include the directory's audience, relevant category, required facts, ownership of the listing, correction process and any charges. Prepare approved business details before submitting them.<br />
<br />
Members can suggest a directory with a short explanation of who it serves. Owners and submission providers should identify their connection. The aim of this discussion is a maintainable discovery plan, including accurate information, rather than a race to produce the largest number of citations.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[How would you choose business directories for a local company without starting from an enormous generic list? I would begin with the business's location, industry and the ways customers look for that service.<br />
<br />
A submission sheet could include the directory's audience, relevant category, required facts, ownership of the listing, correction process and any charges. Prepare approved business details before submitting them.<br />
<br />
Members can suggest a directory with a short explanation of who it serves. Owners and submission providers should identify their connection. The aim of this discussion is a maintainable discovery plan, including accurate information, rather than a race to produce the largest number of citations.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Local SEO audit: how would you resolve conflicting business details?]]></title>
			<link>https://backlinktalk.com/showthread.php?tid=38</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 08:12:33 -0400</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://backlinktalk.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=8">LocalSignal</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://backlinktalk.com/showthread.php?tid=38</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Imagine an example business has one opening time on its website, another on its business profile, and an old address in a directory. Before changing every listing, someone needs to establish which facts are current.<br />
<br />
I would create a business-information sheet with the approved name, address or service-area details, phone, regular hours, special hours, and the owner responsible for updates. Each change should have a source and a review date.<br />
<br />
Google's <a href="https://support.google.com/business/answer/3038177" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">business representation guidelines</a> are the reference for its profile requirements. Consistency work should start with accurate representation, rather than adding keywords to the business name.<br />
<br />
How would you handle an old location that remains visible online?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Imagine an example business has one opening time on its website, another on its business profile, and an old address in a directory. Before changing every listing, someone needs to establish which facts are current.<br />
<br />
I would create a business-information sheet with the approved name, address or service-area details, phone, regular hours, special hours, and the owner responsible for updates. Each change should have a source and a review date.<br />
<br />
Google's <a href="https://support.google.com/business/answer/3038177" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">business representation guidelines</a> are the reference for its profile requirements. Consistency work should start with accurate representation, rather than adding keywords to the business name.<br />
<br />
How would you handle an old location that remains visible online?]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[A local SEO audit starts with accurate business information]]></title>
			<link>https://backlinktalk.com/showthread.php?tid=15</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 06:57:10 -0400</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://backlinktalk.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=1">backlinktalk</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://backlinktalk.com/showthread.php?tid=15</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Review business names, addresses or service areas, opening hours, contact details, and the consistency of location pages. Check that a customer can understand where and how the business operates.<br />
<br />
Look at review processes, useful local content, and how each location is represented on the site. Avoid making changes that misrepresent the business.<br />
<br />
What recurring local SEO issues do you see most often?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Review business names, addresses or service areas, opening hours, contact details, and the consistency of location pages. Check that a customer can understand where and how the business operates.<br />
<br />
Look at review processes, useful local content, and how each location is represented on the site. Avoid making changes that misrepresent the business.<br />
<br />
What recurring local SEO issues do you see most often?]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>